Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 561 A & 439 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 109, 148 and 149 Enforcement of Crime (Crimes) Ordinance (VII) VI of 1979), removing the provisions of Articles 10, 11 and 16 from the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, while the exercise of the petitioners / accused was acquitted by the trial court while the accused were sentenced. The federal Shariat Court dismissed his conviction and obtained remand after the trial. , Applicants / bad accused were also summoned despite no appeal was filed against them. The court and they had wrongly issued the summons, a re-hearing was ordered in light of the Federal Shariat Court decision, if the applicant / acquitted accused were incensed, they had to file an application. Is a cure. Federal law may seek clarification before the court and the decision passed by it. The High Court had no jurisdiction to translate or obtain alternatives through the Federal Shariat Court. Because the case was related to the interpretation of a decision passed by a federal law court immigration advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer