Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus THE STATE

In Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/323/148 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 544 prosecutors supported four witnesses who were injured in the incident. The defense claims that the complaining party hired notorious criminals to launch the attack. On the accused party, Ganja claimed that the defensive explanation of the incident, which was irrational and incomprehensible, was rejected, the accused party attacked the complaining party due to a land dispute that existed between the two parties. And the suspect was the son who was directly involved in the dispute, accused of fatally shooting the deceased, was properly sentenced under Section 2302, PPC, and no one in that case There was no mitigating circumstance that could guarantee any kind of gentle treatment, which the trial court had to impose on the accused. ? $ 302 was required, PPC failed to pass an order to pay compensation under the trial court section 544A, CCPC. The trial court's conduct in punishing the accused, which was also an essential requirement, was dismissed by the High Court with observations that the trial court's conduct should be kept on its service record. advocate for immigration from Orakzai lawyer