Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB IN ITS MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS versus REGISTERED FIRM NISARUL HAQ ASSOCIATES GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS

Appeal for non-payment of court fee was dismissed, court fee section 1870 section 7 (IV) (c) limitation act (IX of 1908), section 5 civil procedure code (VV 1908), section 149. There was no reasonable basis to allow for the extension of time available by the Treasury or to meet the court fee deficiency, even after the plaintiff's objection did not impose the required court fee on the appeal memo, for two years. Was complicating, especially when the trial court's order clearly indicated a payable court fee when the litigation party was in contradiction, the court could not extend the time for its benefit but was contradictory. Defendant's conduct refuses to exercise discretion in his favor in not receiving a court fee on appeal memo from Will. While the default party may not have a good reason for the delay, such a party cannot be allowed to meet the court fee reduction after the deadline. In this case, the delay of every day should not be explained by the claim of the ordinary claimant in any way. The appeal will not be allowed by the appellate court to interfere with the non-payment of court fees, Was not entitled to relief due to. Compromising behavior power of attorney advocate Kandhkot lawyer