SHAMIM AKHTER versus STATE
West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Applicant's Detention under Article 199 Section 3 (1), West Pakistan Rehabilitation Public Order Ordinance, 1960 Provided to District Magistrate by Local Police Legitimate material on the basis of which the applicant was detained was not presented to the High Court, therefore, it is only likely that the District Magistrate did not have any material available to him. Could have provided the basis for the ruling, the applicant could have been detained under the provisions of the West Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance. The ordinance, 1960, was only when there was a threat to public peace and security in the area and there was material to show that in fact peace was such a threat to peace that the District Magistrate had given his conscious intentions. Was applied to the front material and then, after examining the material, came to the conclusion that if Danteo, if left unchecked, would cause mischief. In the area; and that it had to pass an order to achieve the purpose of the ordinance; if any such conditions were not met, the detention order was not granted without any justification and for the purpose of the Public Order Ordinance of the restoration of West Pakistan. Unauthorized reservations will be considered as approved. , The 1960 detention order under which the applicant was ordered to be detained without legal authority and had no legal effect and soon required detente to be released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer