WEST PAKISTAN PAINT MILLS (PVT.) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF SHAGUFTA, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Civil Procedure Code Order XXIII Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A XXIII, R 3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Withdrawal of application between Landlord and Tenant On the basis of a request for a settlement settlement during the holiday in which the tenants were to vacate the premises on the due date in the settlement process, the Applicants are requested that the agreement be signed by any of their directors and attorneys. And that they did not authorize the same appellate court remand. Upon inquiry into the validity of the settlement, the rent controller was ordered by the High Court to evict the tenant on the basis of a compromise between the parties. Accuracy The High Court rightly referred to the theory of indoor management, saying that tenants cannot challenge. The authority of the director who was defending the tenant company. The tenants appeared as witnesses to compromise on their behalf. There was no error in the High Court's contentious decision, so the appeal for interference was denied in the circumstances [agreement].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sialkot lawyer