The trial court dismissed the case for pre-arrest under the provisions of the Punjab Pre-Mutation Act, 1913, while the appellate court for recording the evidence on special matters. He received the remand and set aside the order of remand and also rejected the impeachment case that no decree could be passed until 317 6 1986 in which they could not be passed in favor of the defendants. The viable cause of action against them was lost. The remand order was pending before the High Court, the trial court had passed a preliminary injunction on their behalf on 9 on 1980, therefore, the High Court had acted on the mistaken assumption that no order before 31 7 1986. Appeal to consider whether the appeal was upheld was granted or not, in view of the alleged injunction dated 9th 1980, in favor of the plaintiffs, the High Court did not find them appropriate on this basis.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
