Find a Lawyer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NAROWAL versus KARAMAT ALI

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 121 The respondents were doing business in a market belonging to the District Council, being a tenant of the District Council, on the ground that the Government stopped paying the rent to the District Council on the assurance that their property rights. The eviction proceedings have been initiated against the tenants. They filed a constitutional petition against the applicants (government officials) demanding orders not to fire them or demolish their shops, raising an order to accommodate the respondents and others. By giving them alternate land, the High Court dealt with the Constitutional petition as directed. Applicants' request for accuracy was that the land on which the market was built belongs to the Department Highway or District Council. The respondents and other shopkeepers were in the position of licensor and occupied some part of the land illegally. And in his capacity as administrator of the municipal committee, this officer had no authority to bind the district council or state the Highway Department department for this matter because it was because of land. Of the allotment policy. In his statement, the district council or the Highway Department did not restrict sanctions for leave of appeal and the affidavit of the High Court was canceled, however, the law said nothing to worry about. jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer