Find a Lawyer

JAMAT ALI SHAH versus INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN

Contract Act 1872 Section 586 Evidence Act (I of 1872), Article 85 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff had an agreement between the parties regarding the purchase of shareholding of the company, after which the national facts A lawsuit has been filed for The decision to recover the fixed amount was right up to the High Court. The person prosecuting the plaintiff had no authority to do so and whether the appeal was granted leave of approval, and this case was not authorized. Whether the contract is of a national nature and the defendant's shares have been acquired by the Government, there is disappointment under Contract Section 66, Contract Act, 1872. And whether the leave approval for the appeal of Section 85, the Evidence Act, 1872 (which was the law then) was not relevant, however, it was subject to the condition that the defendant's bank guarantee of satisfaction of the trial court Will present. And provide security to the trial court's satisfaction with respect to the amount of the remaining order famous high court advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer