Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD versus SUPERINTENDENT DAR-UL-AMAN

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Habitat Corpus Applicant, who claimed to have entered into a marriage contract without the consent of his father and relatives, challenged the magistrate's order that the detainee was sent to Darul Aman Fader. Was referred to as a case under Section 11 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, that the Tent Age Detention was presented to the Meteor Magistrate and its statement was filed under section 111. Was gone, the CCPC told itself about the court. The marriage with the applicant was celebrated voluntarily and freely, and the magistrate, who declared her underage under the age of 16, sent her to the Darul Aman instead of allowing her to accompany the applicant or wherever. It was confirmed by DTNew. In order to be 15/16 years of age by a doctor who medically examined her best course, in such a situation, the question of validating the age and the alleged marriage was to drop the evidence by the court of competent jurisdiction, To be resolved by examining the data and the content contained in support of the proportional claims, the order by the magistrate to send the detainees to detention could not have been attributed to any weakness after being detained in the capital. Section 491 does not constitute a false imprisonment or unlawful detention in order to include or attract the provisions of the CR PC. female advocates from Mehrab Pur lawyer