Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Defining section 5 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 161, it was initially alleged that it had confessed to the receipt of money by claiming it was wrong, which the investigating officer said in its investigation. To determine what he failed to complain about. From his original position and at the stand of the trial, the defendant had made statements that the accused had taken from the very beginning of receiving more and more than the original license fee for selling the posters, the prosecution reasonably believed that Money was available The accused was sanctioned as illegal smuggling The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. best advocate from Kamokey lawyer