NAWAB DIN versus NOORA
Approval of Appeals from XLI Original Decisions of the CLC Code of Order O XLI, R 27 Based on the description of the additional evidence and the identification of the property in question, the evidence on record seems to have been construed by the local commissioner. Should have been fixed. Appeals were allowed by the court to seek the correct position on the location of such properties in order to allow additional evidence to be presented, in which case the respondent was required to decide on the offense. The court will be given the opportunity to present evidence and the court orders were set aside below and the trial court was issued to record further evidence regarding the clarification and identification of the two parties' assets. The trial court was directed to appoint a local commissioner from the Revenue Side to delimit both properties to determine whether the two properties were overlapping and if so, to what extent. Later decide the case according to law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Haripur lawyer