Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus ALLAH DITTA

On the basis of the valid confession of the Dhanshin Lady exchange of property on the sale of property by the Prudential uneducated woman who claimed to be her lawyer, the facts were that the plaintiff was an uneducated woman. At the time of confirmation, he had not read the contents of the Power of Attorney nor had he had any free advice. There was no evidence that the proceeds of the sale had been received by him; and in connection with the documents, it was a complete alien burden to seek proof that the prodigal woman intended to execute her or to move her into real estate. Was affecting interest. The person claiming the right or interest under the relevant documents should decide with certainty that there was a transaction in this case. It was widely understood by such a woman and it was indeed her free and intelligent function that if the affected woman were to read, the documents available to her courts must be read in view of the proven facts. Would have been illegal in the lower courts. Dragging of negative signatures against defendants for failure to appear as witness for sub-registrar. It could only be inferred that if such testimony had been presented, he would not have supported the defendants on the question of reading and making the documents in question. Understand that, moreover, there was no reason why the plaintiff's presence in the PR would have generally allowed the attorney to remain unaddressed because of the total alienity of the courts. list of supreme court advocates from Kot Addu lawyer