LIAQAT ALI QURESHI versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE
According to the merit list, the two contenders for the position of Qazi Tehsil Qazi Qazi for the post of Section 10 Tehsil Qazi of the AIR 10 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974 VII) did not prevail in the first position while the defendant who secured the second position. Both candidates were elected. Filing of constitutional petitions was at the top of the list of candidates selected by appellant based on his claim. Respondent accepted the Appellant's first position on the grounds that he was not the owner of the educational qualification The Constitutional petition of the Respondent was accepted and it was found by the High Court that the Appellant did not own the required qualification. Appellant's constitutional request was invalidated and the appellant's objection was rejected, saying that the respondent who failed to become a party to the constitutional petition under the first position of the Electoral Committee (Appellant) was relieved. Was not entitled and the High Court had wrongly accepted his constitutional request, not allowed to attend the constitutional petition before the High Court was not required to join the party.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ukba lawyer