MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF CHATTER
Sections 42, 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974; the jurisdiction of the High Court in matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the Civil Service Constitution Section 47, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 The High Court had forbidden in the nature of the notification that the notification by which the respondent was promoted after proceeding should not be disturbed, which means that the notification is pending. It cannot be canceled or amended even after the High Court hearing, but if the improper order is passed, the matter will not be conditioned. Was not taken into account. Where the conditions of public servants cannot be contrary to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court because of section 47, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974 also adopted the wrong view in issuing an absolute order on which it was ordered. That it was implemented. Cannot be retrieved, recovered or edited even though it was clearly illegal The High Court order was put aside under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Baroute lawyer