Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN versus ALI AKBAR KHAN

Failure to appear and absence of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of CPC O IX, R 7 & O IX, R 13 Failure to file defendant's written statement, Respondent's right to file written statement closed Was dismissed and the trial adjourned to a pre-trial hearing The request for separation of the pre-order was dismissed and the same order was revoked, O IX, R 7, CPC validation Accordingly, where the defendant had assigned a good cause for his earlier negligence, the court should provide him with a hearing in response to the case. He appeared on the due date for the plaintiff in his hearing, in order to determine the earlier part order under O IX, R 7, while the CPC needed to assign only a good reason for his non-submission. He had to provide good reason for keeping the former PAN order separate. O IX, R 7, CPC shall indicate that unless I show that the defendant's conduct is gross negligence, the strict construction of O IX, R 7, CPC should be avoided. Counsel for the defendant appeared on the same day, after which the order was passed in response to the question with the request that the written statement be filed on the file, the High Court did not even consider the provisions contained in OI, R 7, CPC. Do and continue to obey this order. The trial court was not complied with. The illegal order suffered any legal weakness. The High Court's observation indicated that the actual offer involved in the case was not accepted, that is, Whether the case should have been provided to the defendants. More opportunity to file a written statement or case suit law firms from Mithi lawyer