Attempts to compile Articles 302 (b), 324 and 34 Qutal Mum, Qatil MMD, the benefit of the doubt as to the evidence of the joint intention, both the complainant and the prosecution witness, in their statement were closely related to the victim's complainant. Were, in addition, repeat the story. , Presented by him in his preliminary report, presented some new facts and circumstances to bring forward his statement as to the other circumstances of the site plan of the matter, and also contradicted the position of the complainant's report. The complaint was highly suspected, serious suspicion is alleged in the prosecution case, witnesses of the incident had completely looted the prosecutor's case by presenting some new story, allegedly both witnesses. Had failed to prove it in the manner and manner, as the report states. A neutral witness who suppresses the actual facts of the incident, without good reason, will be charged with a negative indication. n To the effect that it was presented, did not support the prosecution's case, the statement of the injured witness with the help of medical witnesses would be sufficient to record the sentence, provided that the same color is correct and the credible injured witness There is no evidence, irresistible facts from the irreparable character and other strong circumstances of the case, though he established the killing of the victim by firearms, and the injuries sustained were the result of firearms, but who was responsible for the incident. Had done, the mystery had wandered. The complainant and the prosecutor's testimony testify to a serious dispute with each other, not believing it
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
