REGIONAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE, UBL MARDAN versus HABIB UL HASSAN
Section G Notice Complaint Notice Limit Employee was appointed as watchman and later, it was promoted because the cashier employee was accused of misappropriating cash received by the customer during his service and codal formal After the proceedings, the employee filed a complaint before the Labor Court. It was accepted and the sentence was amended by a reduction in the previous post, so the appeal was preferred because the employees were terminated in accordance with the law when it accepted the bank (employer) charges. It was later admitted that a notice of complaint must be submitted. Thirty days and the request for complaint was timely barred by the employee. The employee agreed that he was terminated without notice and that the employee confirming the regular inquiry must be scheduled within thirty days. File a notice of complaint within, but it was filed ahead of the deadline and was not requested to be defamed. The delayed filing of notice of complaint to the W Bank (employer) was not submitted within the stipulated time; the employee cannot approach the competent court to resolve his complaint unless the delay of every day is satisfactory. It is not stated as to why the employer had to decide the question of the court if he got the rights. To the extent that such a request was made or not
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
