Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM HAMID MUNSHI versus SIDDIQ


Applicant, who was banned at the time of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 115 Amendment, was of the view that no period had been set for filing the amendment under Section 115, Section 115, CPC Procso 2; The PC specifically provides a 90-day period for filing a revision from the date of the subordinate decision. Revision verification was filed in the court regarding the delay of each period. Instead of explaining the delay to the applicant, it was emphasized that there is no time limit for review under Section 115, CPC and the time was to remain within 90 days. Both the applicant's claims for wrongful amendment were restricted by the time restriction, no explanation for the delay was given, nor was the delayed petition filed by the applicant a revision request Was excluded under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Taxila lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.