Find a Lawyer

ALI NAWAZ versus STATE

Sections 4040 & 9439 Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 11/16 trial court summons two persons as judicial witnesses, along with the conclusion of the prosecution there was defense evidence. , The trial court was able to call a witness. At any stage of the trial, when a person did not take any step to declare a court witness as complainant, so did the accused claiming to marry the abductor, marital, etc., the marital disapproval proved. Were the necessary witnesses to do. The two persons present their testimony as court witnesses through trial, therefore, were not illegal or defamatory in any way, they were also unlikely to be biased because the witnesses were referred to as court witnesses. Was summoned, the accused can cross examine them, however, under Section 65CCC, CCPC cannot claim copies of the statements of the witnesses because their earlier statements were not examined. Previous statements were not available. The IST and the trial court were instructed to provide the defense with the opportunity to examine witnesses the next day if they so desired. law websites from Kamokey lawyer