AFZAL ALI versus AZHAR IQBAL
Sections 15 and 21 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 554 application for the expulsion of landlord and tenant relatives, were denied by the person in possession of the premises while appellant failed to prove his landlord The person in possession also failed to prove his claim. He was included in the premises as a tenant by the previous owner (s), but for the success of the eviction request, the appellant must have proved, through satisfactory evidence, that he had used the landlord as an arbitrary use. In exercise of his discretion, he had included the person as a tenant in the damaged premises. And the view taken by the controller of evidence based on the evidence on the record is that the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties did not exist; the proper and legitimate appellant is advised, if the title is in a competent court law. Excluding in. There is no guarantee of interference. Finding the record by the rent controller
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Khushal Kot lawyer