ABDUL SATTAR SALEEMI versus FEDERAL BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, ISLAMABAD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 4, 25 and 199 Constitutional Application Employee Legislative Institution Removing Employees for Corruption Although a retaliatory action was initiated against the employees, the employee was summoned and a case was heard before the special judge. Where he had gone missing at the request of the employees. The grounds for rehabilitation were rejected on the grounds that even though the Special Judge acquitted the employee, he was not instructed to resign the employer, yet he could not be reinstated by the Special Judge. The effectiveness of the order against which no appeal was filed by the plaintiff. And that was final, because the employee's re-warning was banned because of the economic forces-based executive action was not guaranteed by law. Enjoying the protection of the law and behaving in accordance with the law was not a right of every citizen under Article. 4 of the Constitution Similarly, all citizens were equal before the law and under Article 25 of the Constitution, the applicant was restored to his position with the benefits of equal protection of the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
