RASHIDA BEGUM versus CHIRAGH DIN
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (3) (ii) and 14 Landlord's Personal Needs Integration Request Maintenance Request was filed by the landlord on the basis of his personal need. The tenant claimed that it was withheld under section 14. West Pakistan Citizens Rental Restriction As of Ordinance 1959, the petition filed against the Ogillar tenant was personally dismissed by the landlord personally in good need; not only were the parties different in the eviction request, but More than twenty years have passed since his dismissal. The filing of this request and everything else has not been stable and changes have been made during this long period of twenty years. If the first evacuation request finds that the premises are not needed, it cannot be rationally stated. It should also be noted that below, the landlord did not require a house in dispute by the Court of Appeal, circumventing the law, barring the current eviction request under section 14 of the West Pakistan Civil Rental Ordinance 1959. Was given, comprehensible evidence on record to determine the landlord's most urgent question But the High Court avoided this decision in practice. The constitutional jurisdiction and instead the Court of Appeal should be directed to decide on the landlord's appeal at this point in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shamsabad lawyer