Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD MAI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

West Pakistan Family Court Rules 1965 R 6 West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Article 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application refusing to exercise jurisdiction over false assumptions, for dissolution of marriage Exclude Sue for Impact Suit Territorial jurisdiction is generally lacking in words such as R6, as used in the Rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965 R6, under the interpretation of the Rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965 , Enables the affected wife to file a lawsuit to dissolve the marriage within the local limits. Of which she is usually the resident of the petitioner's husband and parents, and she was living somewhere else while earning her living, so she usually lived from the place where her parents and husband lived. Generally considered to be in the context of a \ alien wife who left her husband's house and moved to a place of her choice. A place of her choice would answer this notion. Usually the applicant usually lived at the place of her choice after separation from her husband, therefore, she was able to bring a marriage dissolution case to the High Court. Generally, we will not even raise questions about the exercise of our constitutional jurisdiction, but where the discovery of the courts below the record is not misleading or based on any evidence (as in the case of the applicant). The High Court can also take constitutional jurisdiction. Under different viewpoints, both courts illegally dismiss their jurisdiction over misconceptions. immigration advocates email from Shogram lawyer