AJMAL HUSSAIN BOKHARI versus COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI
The Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 3, 199 and 212 constitutional application should be dealt with by the authorities responsible for posting and transfer in general, without confirmation of the transfer. A judicial review under 199 of the Constitution Transfer Order, however, will fall under the purview of the appropriate tribunal, the Service Tribunal, under Article 212 of the Constitution, since the administrative matter was made in the terms of a posting or transfer, Which the public servant could not legally object to. In view of Section 9, Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974, where a civil servant has been transferred but left without post, such a case will need to be considered as a matter of fundamental principles as a valuable right post. The right to do so lies in Article 3. The constitution is based on the basic principle of each, to the best of its ability, even under Article 2A, that the federal and provincial governments were guaranteed ordinary social justice by allowing government employees to be punished for a long time. Keeping them on special duty without posting them on special duty was a law-related fraud and executive abuse. Such powers could not be contested and required immediate closure, with the legal right to transfer a transferred civil servant to his position and status, with responsibilities for illegal delay. And in any case not later than thirty days after which the right of exchange of public servant which is guaranteed by the constitution and the law cannot be denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Turbat lawyer