GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE versus FAZAL ELAHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) Railway Servants (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1975, Rr 2 (2) and 3 Removal Services Notice of Notice and Petition Maintenance Employees were previously suspended and subsequently removed from the job, but later removed from the job and reduced by the Assistant Station Master to the Signal Office. But less than his reversal, he was fined two years. He was sent a notice and repeatedly asked to report for duty, but he was absent for a long time. The employee applied for a long period of duty. In the absence of duty due to their absence, it will be prosecuted under the Railway Servants (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975, for reasons which failed to appear in the employee response notice of the cause. Failure to appear, and failing to participate in the Departmental Inquiry, filing a response to the charge sheet, proceedings against it and About ten to ten years after the employee was removed from the job, a notice of employment complaint was taken from the job. The Assistant Station Master's notice of changing the employee to the position of signaller and joining duty and showcasing notices to the employees was also proved by the employer, but he too returned unexpectedly and received notice of the employee that he Pakistan traveled abroad where he was employed by the employee to present his complete ignorance of the action against him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer