MUHAMMAD AKRAM CHAUDHRY versus ADMINISTRATION, QUAID-I-AZAM DIVISIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL, GUJRANWALA
Retaining Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 1 (4) and Section O15 Complaint Request Employed as Senior School Teacher Was appointed and filed a complaint petition in BS 17 challenging his dismissal, claiming that he was an employee and that he was an employer, a commercial and industrial firm. , The employee was providing education to students as a school teacher, so he could not work in any way. Claim that he was doing some specialized work or manual work because it was just an intellectual exercise, only the fact that the employee was writing numbers and words on the blackboard and student work books, and no one was able to correct them by hand. The manual will not be included. Or Maulvi is a laborer and he cannot claim to be a laborer, especially since he was a BS-17 employer running an educational trust, funded by student fees, contributions, grants, gifts, AIDS. On the strength it was not a joint stock company unit that did not adhere to any commercial establishment nor any manufacturing process nor any industrialized West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 or Industrial Relations Ordinance. Employee activities, which are being carried out within the institutional aid premises since the provisions of 1969, N Could not find the truth, and thus could not get the project. Complaint complaint filed by employees in labor court by filing a complaint
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mohmand lawyer