Find a Lawyer

KARAMAT ALI versus NASIR-UR-DIN SHEIKH, POSTMASTER-GENERAL, SOUTHERN PUNJAB, LAHORE

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 applied for sections 25A, 38 (5) and 51 back-benefit intelligence employees who were formerly granted leave of Pakistan, extended the leave for two years, which was rejected and the employees Upon filing a complaint against his dismissal, which was formally informed of the dismissal that the employee who failed the joint duty was dismissed, the Labor Court ordered him to be reinstated with full back benefits. , But upon filing an appeal by the employer against the Labor Court order, the appellate tribunal reduced the back benefits by 50%, Egypt confirmed this point. Courtback's benefits were not given to the employee, he filed a contempt petition against the employer, even though he was granted 50% back, but he could not prove that he was on the date of his dismissal from the job. Deprived of employment, while the job was thought to be unemployed abroad, the employee did not do any work even after returning from overseas and after being reinstated in his service. Being and being absent from his duty was certainly a viable practice, for such a controversial and disobedient employee employee residence. The small room was available, the employee was not entitled to any accommodation and benefits, the decision of the High Court was not complete. In his favor, the employee sought to implement and enforce the tribunal's decision, which he claimed was entitled to a 50% return, but the tribunal's decision was merged with the High Court's decision. After that, the blasphemy filed by the employees patent advocate from Parachinar lawyer