SARDAR ALI versus SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS,(RAILWAY BOARD), ISLAMABAD
Amended Leave Rules 1980 R 18 (2) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 19 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Leave the preparation of retirement at the request of a Government servant to receive a major share. After his leave applied for the cancellation of his remaining leave, which the accepted authority did not accept, however, he himself, withdrew the leave preparation order for retirement and resumed his duty. The instructed civil servant joined duty, but after a while his case was reviewed and his retirement was formally granted for retirement. For a government employee who was employed in a job, it was considered as a period of leave from his leave. Six continued to serve for six years after his service. The Call of Re-Order of the Call, We could not be recovered under the principle of Lux Positivety, and without notice, the right was obtained in favor of the public servant, the public servant would be considered an employee of his department or The leave revised under R18 (2) rules shall be applicable to all purposes on the basis of an order approved under 1980. Calling back to resume duty The civil servant was ordered to be reinstated with all incentives as though he had never retired.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
