Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus POSTAL DEPARTMENT

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 1 (3), 2 (xxviii) and 25 A Government Employee (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, R 21, to supervise the jurisdiction of the postal department's supervisory staff, even the employees of the labor courts. Workers. Attending the Post Office, Night Light / School System broke the school system upon leaving charge of its Department / Night Light School system, after which the employee claimed to be an employee of his parent's department, the Postal Department but his The department later refused to withdraw it. The employee filed a complaint for restoration at the postal job but his request was rejected. The employment privileges pertaining to the restoration of the employment of the Labor Court employee shall be made to the Clerk of the Post and Telegraph Department under the definition of worker in terms of section 2 (xxviii). The provisions of section 1 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Ordinance, hold that although the Real Estate Ordinance shall not apply to persons employed in the administration of the State, the Railway, Post Office, Telegraph. And the low-paid employees of the telephone departments are excluded, and unless they are employed in administrative, administrative or supervisory roles, workers of the post office are entitled to seek the provisions of the labor laws. In retracing department entitled to maintain a request for complaint against non-maintenance of license Old, and they can Labor Court jurisdiction the rights of employees in the department parents. If he has been certified against a permanent position in another department / organization employee, then for the better future \ n patent advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer