Find a Lawyer

ANWAR (MST.) versus IMAM DIN

Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII and XVII of the CPC Review, R4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request File filed for the parties to be served on Friday submitted before the trial court next day , In which the defendants were. After the previous proceedings and on the same day the statement of the plaintiff was recorded, the former partition discretion was granted against the plaintiff's court, after which the former partition Dream Order was postponed and the trial was adjourned for further proceedings. The plaintiff's review of the lawsuit was approved and the trial court was instructed that the frames issue be given to the parties to present their evidence in support of their arguments and then to request the former party's decree be set aside. Decide OXVII, R 4, CPC supply mainly deals with situations where up to this date The matter is settled. The leave trial court should have taken proper notice of his error the next day when the matters were put before him. The court is facing negligence, in terms of OXVII, R4, by the court's discretion. Not using, was the illegal exercise of jurisdiction to order a prior party action against the CPC defendant and then to pass the ex parte order in a hurry. The same day, the trial court's dismissal order after the trial court's filing of the lawsuit will indicate that the trial court did not exercise jurisdiction to restrict it by law. Nor did he fail to exercise his authority over it, nor did he do it. This time online advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer