Find a Lawyer

WAHID BUX versus GHULAM AKBAR SHAH

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXIII, R3 and Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Suite 19 7 1986 Declaration on the consent of the respondent The counsel for counsel and the seven defendants who were present in the petitioner of the court under section 12 (2) were accepted and the order and decision were laid aside in the suit before which the reviewing court agreed and The decision was restored and the application dismissed under section 12 (2). ), The CPC accuracy order, which has been approved by the amending court, can only be determined if it has been shown that it has been approved without legal authority and has no legal effect. , The fact finding recorded by the trial court was supported by the material on record. , It cannot be considered either arbitrary or the immovable suit was decided not only on the statement of the lawyer but also on the statements of the two accused who had agreed. None of the defendants appeared in the witness box to state that their source (who made the voluntary statement) had not been appointed, or that the voluntary statement in question was a fraudulent trial. A court was created under which a pre-arrest case was decided according to law. Procedure, no interference with constitutional jurisdiction was demanded No constitutional petition required how to become a advocate from Khair Pur lawyer