Find a Lawyer

ALI ANJUM SHAH versus SAR ANJUM

The pre-emption of two courts under the unauthorized performance of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987 section 13 was a fundamental basis for the student's reliance on the questionnaire by the defendant, which means that by means of the evidence as well Proof of this must be presented and no evidence was available. On the record that the plaintiff made the money in a single meeting in which he learned of the sale transaction from two witnesses, while recording his statement in the court plaintiff, there is no word about the student settlement. The statement of Bola and her lonely witness remained silent. At this point the suit was liable to be rejected on the ground that the judgment of the plaintiff was not upheld as a result of the misrepresentation of the court's judgment and the court's orders, according to which the plaintiff's case was dismissed. patent advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer