GHULAM ZOHRA versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The High Court Police Officer did not obtain a certificate from the doctor before recording the statement of the victim in an injured state, hearing the plea against the accused. That he was not fit to make a statement, nor did he offer a plausible explanation for such error and fitness for the victim to make a statement, thus, supporting the prosecution's case of witnesses to the deceased statement. And their evidence comes from the obvious. Contradictions that indicate the truth / truth of the death, the declarant police officer also failed to obtain the presence of a magistrate while recording the record of the victim's statement. In the circumstances, they could not be safely processed. Keeping the accused's conviction for murder even as otherwise indicated by the prosecution is proof that the victim burned himself to include the accused in this case, according to the prosecution's story. Suspicions were created, which is why both appeals were denied leave of appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Shahdad Kot lawyer