ABDUL SATTAR versus SHAMIM AKHTAR
CPC Processing Parties of Civil Procedure Code Order I may be requested by the applicant in Suite OI, R10 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), to reject such application by the High Court. Claimed to be the owner of the property in question, and on that basis the claim of the plaintiff was declared illegal and invalid by the trial court's order from the plaintiff with whom the applicant was satisfied and Which was against. They did not file an appeal or revision, concluding that such an inquiry was finalized that the applicant can no longer claim to be the property owner, in his application under OER 10, filed a deadline petitioner. On the basis of this, the CPC had failed to suppress the facts about the past. The plaintiff took special oath at the petitioner's suggestion and stated that no interference with the order passed by the civil court was not guaranteed which led to the dismissal of the High Court. Gone cis
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer
