Find a Lawyer

COMMANDANT, 502, E.M.E. CENTRAL WORKSHOP, RAWALPINDI versus NO. M.E-19862 LDC AYUB HUSSAIN

Government Rules (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Removal of Corruption from Service Tribunal Reduced the penalty for dismissal from three time scales in its time scale for three terms Changed steps. Without the overall effect, the Year / Integrity Service Tribunal offered good reasons for undermining public servants because the Service Tribunal found that corruption had occurred between the public servant and the head clerk, and both of them suddenly Had compromised and assured goodwill writing. The ensuing service tribunal also noted the fact that the respondent had already worked in the department for seven years and that the sentence for removal from service was somewhat severe and that the service tribunal had exercised jurisdiction over its appeal. The winner was fully capable of editing and reducing the fine. The penalties imposed by the Department Authorities Service Tribunal, as well as the unreasonable order of the service tribunal, were less appropriate and fair in lowering the respondent from the major penalties provided by the Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973. Neither suffered any legal impairment, nor was the leave to appeal a judicial error denied. registration advocate from Timergara lawyer