Find a Lawyer

HABIB SUGAR MILLI LTD., NAWABSHAH versus MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 38 (3a) and 49 (3) were sought by the representative representation on the direction that the Labor Court complete the proceedings without further delay as in this case the employment of poor laborers. Employers worked on remand. The lawyer in favor of representing them without obtaining the prior permission required under Section 49 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, but such representation was not allowed by the Labor Court that the mill managers who had already appeared and They are well aware of the labor laws, and thus they do not have to represent their cases through the Advocate. At this point the employers filed a review against a Labor Court order that is involved in the case. It was very easy and did not require any further explanation which required the Advocate's presentation from the employer Mills. Those who were already present in the court, and were fully aware of the labor laws, could easily represent employers without further harm, so the Labor Court allowed a lengthy hearing to stop the proceedings and allow advocates to debate the matter. Refused to do. lawer from fb area from Nowshera lawyer