Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI versus AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Seniority Rules 1993 Rr 4 and 7 was working as a stenographer in the seniority assessment office of public servants, he was a regular employee and was in serial number 3 of the seniority list in front of a government employee who worked in various departments. He was transferred to the deputy position of public servant for three years and within three years of his representation he was posted as stenographer in opposition to the public servant, not only absorbed in the office of public servant. Was chosen to be where they were transferred to the Depot, but also heard their name Standing Committee on Irrigation was in serial number 3 of the list. The public servant's name was already there, the opposing public servant had to take advantage of his former service in the other department from which he was transferred. According to the R4 of the Seniority Roll, in 1993 there is a hiring of a civil servant on the job, cadre or position. From the date of the regular appointment to a job, cadre or post, opposing a public servant has had to calculate his age since he was Reggio. The regular official employed as a stenographer before opposing a public servant. In the serial number 3 of the seniority list, the name of the public servant was wrongfully harassed, where the name of the public servant was already present. list of advocates from Chaininda lawyer