Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN versus SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES, PUNJAB


The contempt of court Act 1976 section 3 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 issued a contempt of court notice to the respondents effective petition was issued by the High Court under which the respondents were issued instructions. That they should proceed but strictly in accordance with the law, the respondents (section HO) in their comment had submitted that a criminal case has already been registered on the applicant's complaint and the inquiry is already underway. According to the proceedings, there was no violation of court. Notice of contempt order issued to such respondents was withdrawn; other respondents claimed that they did not insult or committed contempt of court and in fact continued to recover the order of the court. The plan has been paused. The respondents were the respondents in writing, so was not responsible for the contempt of court notice issued to the respondents.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Utror lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.