Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulation for the Development and Settlement of Plots or State Rules 1985 Rr 8 & 16 Allotment of Plots by the Municipal Committee, Section 44 Constitutional Application Chairman, VIII of 1974, VIII of 1974. Cancellation of such allotment. As Chairman of the Illegal Allotment Validation, the municipal committee was not invested with the power to regulate the allotment or allotment except in the case of 16, the Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulations Allotment, the Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulations. None of the requirements were mentioned under R8. In R 8, the rules of the Mirpur Municipal Committee were satisfied with the regularity of plots, their allotment or regular chairman on the basis of encroachment or occupation, the municipal committee (which had no jurisdiction to allocate) Was. The allotment of allotment under the question will not create any right to void. In favor of the allotment, non-service of the notice was not guaranteed before the cancellation of the allotment, even though the system is well-integrated into the law. In order to obtain the right of the person affected by the hearing, it must show that he was entitled to no rights. The applicant has no right to claim the hearing without having any jurisdiction. Question pending allotment, invalid. Being, they did not deserve any relief. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Quetta lawyer