Find a Lawyer

SHAH BEGUM versus SUGHRAN BEGUM

Laws Evidence Order 1984 Arts 76 and 77 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 42 Secondary Proof Production Accessories Supply of Divorce for the Plaintiff Not Provided by the Respondent During the Life of the Plaintiff's Husband The effect should be that the best evidence should be available. The lease should be presented by a party where the original document was available. It should have been presented because the evidence was the best and the most basic evidence while the secondary evidence was only in the absence of the basic evidence. Was acceptable unless the loss of the original function was proved or it was proved that the original party was of the opposing party I bzy, or secondary evidence Invincible was in before the other party notice to be given secondary evidence of the contents of the original document which was not written notice. The party relying on the opposition party would present a document in its possession, could not provide secondary evidence to the pro-Nawab, where it was not in the written statement that it was concrete that the original document (divorce) was with the plaintiff and not the case. The defendant attempted to sue the plaintiff for bringing the case to trial, in which case the divorce evidence produced by the defendant was inadmissible and such photostat copy could not be relied upon. Even if it was accepted by the plaintiff that the defendant had divorced the plaintiff, even through the defendant. It was not established that he was conveyed to the plaintiff during his lifetime. They knew about her husband or that there was no evidence on record that a divorce was obtained. inheritance advocates near Swabi lawyer