Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE FAROOQI versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 23 [as adopted in Azad Jammu and Kashmir] General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 Constitutional application for public purposes. Settlement of compensation for collector land and provide specific amount for payment of required amount to the government owners Stopping payment to the owners on the direction of the Prime Minister Petition requested that the constitutional petition against non-payment of land compensation be dismissed by the Supreme Court. Directed, the authorities directed the applicant to pay compensation provided he transferred his title. The Supreme Court's directive was not complied with to obtain the authority's direction and instead the notification on acquisition of underground land was rejected. The government's order to pay the petitioner was approved by the Supreme Court and the directive was approved. The applicant was issued to the authorities to pay the compensation amount, so the government did not have the capacity Or retrieve those who were obliged to follow and enforce and enforce the Supreme Court's decision, and under the Constitution, the Supreme Court's decision has become mandatory. There was no justification for deprivation, so the applicant had to occupy and use the land for such a long time. And the subsequent notification under which the prior notification regarding the acquisition of the land was returned, thus it was declared invalid of the applicant to receive any legal effect. To submit a pass when you need a advocate from Noor kot lawyer