MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus ZARINA BEGUM
Amendment of the plaintiff to the plaintiffs in the amendment phase of the amendment phase of Section 115 and OVI, R17 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 petitions. Provided that the use of the amending powers filed by the defendant against the initial issue of partial distress requires that an order be passed by the subordinate court under which any contravention of any of the terms of section 115 Was charged with partial removal of the High Court in connection with the CPC revision petition. The question was pending, nevertheless, no route was passed by the trial court in relation to the amendment of the case to the High Court, therefore, there was no jurisdiction to assume the role of the trial court and to amend the plaintiff. ? The plaintiff's High Court, therefore, was not legally authorized to decide the issue of amendment in one way or another when there was no such trial court considered and decided
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Lalshanra lawyer
