Find a Lawyer

FAZAL HUSSAIN versus WALIDAD KHAN

The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Section 52 [as adopted in Azad Jammu and Kashmir] in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Constitutional application pertaining to such rights in the revenue record permits the rights of state land. Copies indicate that certain respondents entered the occupation column of the respondents' ancestral settlement did not accept the constitutional petition with evidence of a photostat copy, underground, in question. It cannot be considered a transfer based on the proprietary property of the respondents. Respondents' claims about Quake were completely negated. Most of the documentary evidence relied on by the respondents was the land of the country in question. The fact that the defendants had been receiving land revenue since 1962 was not given any proprietary rights to the respondents. In this case, the High Court's underground question has jurisdiction over whether the respondents' ancestors entered the land as occupied during the Dogra Regime. It was not only wrong and bad of the law but in fact the High Court was also wrong order under which the respondents were declared to have proprietary rights over the land. And the order approved by the Board of Revenue was restored to the status quo pakistani advocates Moro lawyer