AMANAT KHAN versus FEDERAL LAND COMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Occupation of underground land at the relevant time Re-occupying more land Land-related dispute, has found that the defendants land on land. Were cultivating. The underground question, thus, was allotted in favor of the respondents on account of their alleged occupation, in the constitutional petition the High Court affirmed the Land Commission's affirmation that the applicants disputed the relevant land at the relevant time. The defendant's possession was also confirmed. In favor of a copy of Khusra Gadarwari's and Goswara prepared by Patwari, the first party was allowed to consider the dispute raised by the petitioner or the plea of the petitioners that the respondents at the relevant time. Were not cultivating underground land.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Lalshanra lawyer