Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AMANAT KHAN versus FEDERAL LAND COMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Occupation of underground land at the relevant time Re-occupying more land Land-related dispute, has found that the defendants land on land. Were cultivating. The underground question, thus, was allotted in favor of the respondents on account of their alleged occupation, in the constitutional petition the High Court affirmed the Land Commission's affirmation that the applicants disputed the relevant land at the relevant time. The defendant's possession was also confirmed. In favor of a copy of Khusra Gadarwari's and Goswara prepared by Patwari, the first party was allowed to consider the dispute raised by the petitioner or the plea of the petitioners that the respondents at the relevant time. Were not cultivating underground land.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Lalshanra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.