Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MARYAM BIBI

Appeals for leave were dismissed for appeal of the Applicants of the Supreme Court ROs XXVI, XX1, R1, O XXXIII, R6 & OV, R2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 187 and 188 and so on. Likewise a revision petition was also filed against the petitioner for further consideration of the exemption case, which was pending in the court of jurisdiction over the detained property since 1950, even as the defendants In the appeal filed by, he applied to the plaintiff as a majority of the 166 persons who were claimants of interest. There were a large number of such respondents in question in the property and during the hearing of the case, every person who appeared to the Supreme Court who had any right to any property said that he was fully aware of these proceedings and if the application He was fully informed if no regular notice was taken on the passenger. Applicants, taking advantage of only one tactic, before appearing for review before the Supreme Court, were seen sitting silently during the proceedings pending the outcome of the decision. , They could benefit from such artwork The request was not able to be revised on the first order refusing to enjoy the revision request pakistani advocates Loralai lawyer