Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD AZEEM SHAH

As a pre-trial tenant on account of being a partner in the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R22 Khata and being the heir of the seller claimant, Resistance to. In question, the trial court found that the plaintiff had a pre-emptive right to dismiss while he denied the defendant's claim of being the tenant of the respondent's land. The plaintiff had failed to file cross-objections in support of the claimant's claim of his tenancy, which was rejected by the court at trial after the trial. The reason for the appeals court, however, was the decision of the plaintiff's case and the second appeal was affirmed by the high court, with the plaintiff refusing to consider such a case before the first Kanel Nan case. Earlier, the appellate court had failed to file any objections. (PLD 1983 SC 53) whereby it was maintained that no cross-objection was registered before the First Appellate Court to challenge the finding of a single case involved in this case. Will be searched. Finalized and was not responsible for reopening. Appeal disputes arose out of which the aforesaid Supreme Court order was heard, the appeal was not competent on that basis. female advocates from More kunda lawyer