SALIM,SOZER versus ABDUL JABBAR QURESHI
Section 15 (2) (ii) and 18, the tenant resisted the request for eviction on the basis of default for payment of rent expenses on the basis that after the death of the original landlord, Sindh Rented Premises Under Section 18 of the Ordinance 1979, the notice was not served to the tenant after the death of the original landlord when it was notified that the deceased had given the respondents / landlords its legal heirs in order to inherit the houses in the dispute. As the left and the fact was not challenged by the tenant otherwise the landlord, even after the death of the real, the tenant originally The landlord was paying rent to the landlords / legal heirs, thus default in filing the rent was in filing an eviction request. The rent controller finds that the section of section 18 of the rentals In the absence of service of notice under. Demand for deletion of the Ordinance, 1979 could not be made by default so it had no qualification
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Panjan Kisan lawyer