SIKANDAR ALI versus ABDUL RAHEEM ALIAS LEEMON
The Civil Procedure Code of CPC Plants O VII, R 11, O IX, R 9 and Section 115 was rejected in the terms of Order VII VI O IX, R 9, instead of challenging the non-processing petitioner, the CPC issued the same. Sue due to action Subsequent litigation was dismissed under OVII, R 11 on the basis that subsequent proceedings did not result in the same case, the petitioner's appeal against the dismissal of the case as well. Was deleted Apply under O IX, R 9, CPC to set aside the dismissal for showing cause for not appearing on a specific date when the case for a hearing was sought, the applicant in such treatment Was unsuccessful, but a fresh case has been filed for the same reason that the action was banned on O IX, R 9, CPC based on the same action and order between the parties. Was displayed illegally or had suffered an illegality. On the question of O IX, R 9, CPC, the fact of the two courts below was factual and appropriate and demanded not to interfere with the review, the matter was retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Daud Khel lawyer