Find a Lawyer

DAD REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The provisions of Articles 2 and 5 of the Ahram-e-Ramadan Ordinance 1981 provided food to travelers in the month of Ramadan, beginning in June 1983 to March 1992, under the auspices of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 18 Constitutional Applicants. ? However, in 1993, the Authority refused to allow the applicant to sell food and other food items in the month of Ramadan Petitioner, after which, it closed its hotel validity authority in response to a constitutional petition. Forced to do it. In view of the admitted facts, the consent of the bus stop and the consent of the constitutional application under strict restrictions of the provisions of the Ordinance Petitioner were entitled to the exemption granted in Section 5 of the Ramadan Ordinance 1981, the authority did not deny that. During the month of Ramadan, the applicant was allowed for a hotel exemption for 11 years. Only objection was raised by the authority that the applicant was providing food to the citizens of the area under such exemption. Such allegation was not proven by any material, even otherwise I [have been accused of providing food to the citizens during the month of Ramadan. D) The ordinance authority, however, was not even verbally asserted that during the month of Ramadan, the applicant was never against the Act of Authority for not granting an exemption under section 5 (2) of the ordinance. The operation was illegal, unauthorized and illegal. Applicant violates Article 18 of the Constitution by running his hotel business and bus stop at section 5, Ahram e Ramadan Ordinance 1981 ask a advocate free from Chaininda lawyer