Find a Lawyer

ANJUM HAYAT MIRZA versus REHMAT KHAN

Sindh's tenant payment ordinance 1979 section 15 in the payment of rent was not satisfactory because the evidence provided by the tenant was unable to show that there was no owner in paying the rent for the specified period of the tenant. The period after the entry by the owner was related that the receipts signed did not prove in the case of the tenant that there was no default as to why this payment was made in this year's data. Such receipts were presented by the tenant and would therefore explain the relationship in which he was unsuccessful. Thus, the tenant failed to prove that the default in payment of rent was the default in payment of rent under the circumstances. patent advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes